Skip to content
BankAutomation

FIS reconciliation software for banks on IBS, Horizon and Modern Banking Platform

BankAutomation is reconciliation software for banks that run an FIS core. It proves the settlement accounts the core posts to but cannot balance on its own, commercial ACH origination, Fedwire, debit and credit card settlement, the Federal Reserve account, correspondents and suspense, against the general ledger every day, from the report files your team already saves. Nothing is installed on IBS, Horizon or Modern Banking Platform, and plans are published from $1,200 a month.

Run the demo

Visa / Mastercard / ATM · value date 03 sep 2026

Card settlement vs ledger, sample data

Match rate

80.0%

Breaks

3

At risk

$1m

Oldest

3d

Date ±1d
Amount

This console matches the first rows a side. It left out statement and ledger . Nothing in the rows left out is counted below. To run a full file, .

BRK-001

Aged 0d

$918,442.05

2026-09-03 · both sides

SETTL/MC/0903 · MASTERCARD SETTLEMENT

Amount differs by 442.05 USD

Post the 442.05 USD difference as a deducted charge and add the fee to the standing accrual for this counterparty.

FEE NOT ACCRUED

→ Finance

BRK-002

Aged 3d

$86,340.20

2026-08-31 · ledger

REFUND/BATCH/7781/R · REFUND SUSPENSE

Posted in the ledger, not on the statement

Trace the posting to its instruction, repair the reference and re-present it, or reverse it if the payment was returned.

MISSING REFERENCE

→ Payments Ops

BRK-003

Aged 0d

$27,905.62

2026-09-03 · statement

INTCH/FEE/0903 · SCHEME INTERCHANGE FEE

On the statement, nothing in the ledger

Post 27,905.62 USD to the charges account for the period and add it to the standing accrual so it stops surfacing as a break.

FEE NOT ACCRUED

→ Finance

Everything matched under these tolerances.

Tighten the date or amount tolerance to see the breaks it was absorbing.

Scheme settlement file

Visa / Mastercard / ATM

Value date Reference Amount
2026-09-02 SETTL/VISA/0902 1,942,318.44
2026-09-02 SETTL/MC/0902 864,207.10
2026-09-03 SETTL/VISA/0903 2,105,660.85
2026-09-03 SETTL/MC/0903 918,442.05
2026-09-03 CHGBK/VISA/44120 12,480.00
2026-09-03 INTCH/FEE/0903 27,905.62
2026-09-02 ATM/INTERCHANGE/0902 41,220.75
2026-09-01 SETTL/AMEX/0901 233,915.40
2026-09-03 REFUND/BATCH/7781 86,340.20
2026-09-02 ATM/CASH/0902 158,700.00

Core banking postings

Settlement account

Value date Reference Amount
2026-09-02 SETTL/VISA/0902 1,942,318.44
2026-09-02 SETTL/MC/0902 864,207.10
2026-09-03 SETTL/VISA/0903 2,105,660.85
2026-09-03 SETTL/MC/0903 918,000.00
2026-09-03 CHGBK/VISA/44120 12,480.00
2026-09-02 ATM/INTERCHANGE/0902 41,220.75
2026-09-02 SETTL/AMEX/0901 233,915.40
2026-09-03 REFUND/BATCH/7781 86,340.20
2026-08-31 REFUND/BATCH/7781/R 86,340.20
2026-09-02 ATM/CASH/0902 158,700.00
Matched pairs are tinted on both sides. Breaks carry the brass left rule and appear in the worklist.

Sample data only. Matching runs in your browser; classification is written by the model when you press Run. Matching done in your browser. Writing classifications… Classifications written by the model on this run. Decision support, not a compliance determination. The classification model was unavailable, so the built-in rule classifier wrote these. Same matching, same numbers. This console classifies up to 12 runs a minute and this run went over, so the built-in rule classifier wrote these. Same matching, same numbers. Wait a minute for the model, or . The model wrote the first 8 classifications. The rule classifier wrote the rest ().

Open the full resolver

What to ask of reconciliation software on an FIS core

Six checks for any demo

Matching two columns is easy. Tying the core to the Fed, the networks and every correspondent each morning, with every break owned, is what retires the workbook.

01

Works from saved reports

Core GL detail, settlement reports, Fed, network and correspondent files, Nacha and BAI2. No core interface to license.

02

Settlement windows, not posting dates

Originated batches are grouped by FedACH window, so timing never shows up as a difference.

03

Held batches surfaced

A batch posted to the customer and never sent to the Fed is its own open item with an owner.

04

Wires matched by IMAD

Late wires are recognized as timing and closed when they post.

05

Two person rule changes

Each rule is proposed and approved by different people and its version is stored on every match (Platform plan and above).

06

Read only

Nothing posts back. The core stays the book of record and no money moves.

Does FIS sell reconciliation software

Yes, but it is a separate product line from the core. FIS Data Integrity Manager, the platform formerly sold as IntelliMatch, covers enterprise, nostro, ATM and confirmation matching with payments investigation and exception management. Its showcase deal in May 2026 was the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, which moved it to SaaS on Microsoft Azure at more than 150 million transactions a day. FIS also runs an Optimized Reconciliation Service, a managed offering aimed at capital markets firms.

That tells you who Data Integrity Manager is built for: large institutions with a dedicated reconciliation function, a multi-year budget and a procurement process to match. A $3 billion bank on IBS or a community bank on Horizon has the same daily problem at a fraction of the volume. Its ACH clearing GL, Fedwire settlement, card settlement and due from accounts still need to tie to outside evidence every morning, usually in spreadsheets built from core reports. BankAutomation is priced and packaged for that bank.

9%

of US banks run an FIS core

$1B to $150B

asset range FIS gives for IBS banks

40+

IBS institutions above $10 billion

$1,200

a month, published starting price

The 9 percent share is from the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City's March 2024 briefing on core providers, citing a 2022 ABA survey. The IBS figures are from FIS's IBS brochure. The price is ours.

FIS cores and what changes for reconciliation

The Kansas City Fed describes FIS as the core provider that mainly serves large and midsized banks, with a much smaller credit union base than Fiserv or Jack Henry. That shapes the work. An FIS bank tends to carry more commercial volume, more correspondents and more payment rails per accountant than a typical community bank, so reconciliation is less about one person's workbook and more about a queue of breaks that several people share.

CoreWho runs it (FIS materials)Where reconciliation time goes
IBS (Integrated Banking Solution) Community to large regional banks; FIS calls it the platform of choice for banks between $1 billion and $150 billion in assets, with more than 40 clients above $10 billion Commercial ACH origination with exposure limits, Fedwire volume, treasury management sweeps, several correspondents and a busy Fed account
Horizon Community banks, positioned by FIS as a modern core for retail and commercial customers ACH and debit card settlement, official checks, one or two due from accounts and a small team that also closes the month
Modern Banking Platform FIS's cloud native, modular core for institutions that are modernizing Two cores in parallel during migration, so every clearing account must be proven on both

Swipe the table sideways to read every column.

Positioning as stated in FIS brochures and product pages, checked October 2026. Credit unions on FIS cores face the same work; see the credit union page for share drafts and shared branching.

None of these cores needs an interface to be reconciled. If the core can write its daily GL detail and settlement reports to a file, that file is the ledger side of the match. Credit unions will find share drafts, shared branching and the corporate account covered on credit union reconciliation software.

Regional bank accounting manager and an analyst reviewing settlement account balances on two monitors

The accounts an FIS bank proves every morning

The core posts to customers. The money settles somewhere else: on the Fed account, at the card networks, at a correspondent. Each of those leaves a clearing GL behind that someone has to prove against evidence the core did not produce.

AccountCore sideOutside evidenceBreak that shows up most
ACH origination Originated batches debited to commercial customers and the ACH clearing GL FedACH settlement entries by window on the Fed statement of account A batch posted to the customer and held by exposure review, so it never reached the Fed
ACH receipt and returns Received items, returns and NOCs posted to accounts FedACH receipt and return settlement, Nacha files A return settled today and posted tomorrow
Fedwire Outgoing and incoming wires and the wire clearing GL Fedwire Funds entries on the Fed statement and the wire system log A wire released after the posting cutoff, booked on the next business day
Debit and credit card settlement Card postings and the card settlement GL Processor and network settlement reports, net settlement on the Fed or correspondent account Interchange and network fees netted out of settlement
Federal Reserve account Due from FRB GL Statement of account, FIRD or the daily statement Service charges, cash orders and adjustments booked on another day
Correspondents Due from GL per correspondent BAI2 or CSV statement from each correspondent Sweeps, fees and returned items the correspondent posted first
Suspense and clearing Suspense GLs The items meant to clear them Old items nobody owns

Swipe the table sideways to read every column.

Report names differ by core and by GL design. The structure of the work does not.

Each row has its own page when it is the one that hurts: ACH reconciliation software, debit card reconciliation software, federal reserve account reconciliation software, correspondent bank reconciliation software and suspense account reconciliation software.

Commercial ACH and Fedwire are where IBS banks lose the morning

A bank in the IBS asset range usually originates ACH for hundreds of commercial customers: payroll, vendor payments, collections. Batches arrive all day, some are held for exposure or fraud review, and FedACH settles them in four windows. Forward items settle at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time and Same Day ACH settles at 1:00, 5:00 and 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The core, meanwhile, posts the offset to the customer when the batch is accepted.

So the ACH clearing GL and the Fed account rarely agree at a glance. Most of the difference is timing and window grouping, and somewhere inside it sits the one batch that was posted to the customer and never sent, which is the item that becomes a loss if nobody sees it. Fedwire adds its own version of the same problem: a wire released after the core's posting cutoff appears on the Fed statement today and on the GL tomorrow.

BankAutomation groups originated batches by settlement window, matches each window to its Fed entry, and leaves only the batches with no settlement partner. Wires are matched by IMAD and amount, so a late wire is recognized as timing and closed when it posts. The Fed side of the match is described in detail on federal reserve account reconciliation software.

A worked example from an ACH origination day on IBS

Input

One day of originated ACH against the Fed account

  • Fed statement of account, FedACH origination settlement · 4 entries (8:30 a.m., 1:00, 5:00 and 6:00 p.m. ET) · 18,742,310.40 USD
  • Core postings to the ACH origination clearing GL · 47 batches · 3,912 items · 18,754,810.40 USD
  • ACH origination log · 47 batches accepted · 1 batch held for exposure review

Output

Matched groups and what is left

  • Matched 46 batches grouped to the four FedACH settlement entries by window: the forward window at 8:30 a.m. and the three Same Day windows. No batch is compared to the GL one by one.
  • Open 1 payroll batch of 38 items, 12,500.00 USD, debited to the customer on the core and held by exposure review, so it never reached the Fed. Assigned to ACH operations with an age of 0 days.

The figures tie: 18,754,810.40 less 18,742,310.40 is 12,500.00, the held batch. Without grouping, the analyst sees a difference of 12,500.00 mixed in with every timing item of the day. With grouping, it is one line with an owner before 9 a.m., and the customer's employees still get paid that day if the batch is released before the next window.

FIS Data Integrity Manager or a separate platform, compared

These are the routes we see at banks on FIS cores. Each one is the right answer for somebody.

RouteWorks well whenWhere it runs outPrice signal
Core reports and spreadsheets A handful of settlement GLs and one experienced person No record of who matched what, rebuilt every day, stops when that person is out Staff time
FIS Data Integrity Manager A large bank with a reconciliation team, SWIFT and nostro volume and an existing FIS relationship Sized and priced for enterprise programs, heavy for a bank that needs ACH, card and Fed matching Quote only
Trintech ReconNET or Frontier High volume matching and a long US bank reference base Quoted per customer, cloud migration and re-quote at renewal Quote only
SmartStream or Gresham Global banks and capital markets workloads Implementation scope and cost match that scale Quote only
ReconArt Bank, card and close modules from one vendor Per user licensing grows with the team Capterra lists from $300 per user a month
BankAutomation Daily ACH, Fedwire, card, Fed and correspondent accounts in one queue with published pricing Reads files and does not post back to the core; no SWIFT messaging or confirmation matching $1,200, $3,900 or $9,500 a month

Swipe the table sideways to read every column.

Positioning from vendor materials and public listings checked in October 2026. BankAutomation is not affiliated with FIS.

If your bank already licenses Data Integrity Manager for nostro and securities, keep it there. The case for a separate platform is the daily domestic settlement work that the enterprise license prices on volume. Banks comparing the enterprise options will find them taken apart in intellimatch alternatives and smartstream tlm alternatives. Banks on other cores have sister pages: Fiserv reconciliation software and Jack Henry reconciliation software.

Core conversions to or from an FIS core

Two bank operations staff comparing old and new core balance printouts during a core conversion

Banks move onto IBS and Horizon from other cores, and onto Modern Banking Platform from older FIS cores. Every conversion has the same accounting risk: for a few weeks, settlement GLs exist on two systems with different report layouts, and a clearing balance that does not move cleanly becomes a suspense item that outlives the project.

Because BankAutomation reads files, the old core and the new core are just two sources. You map both report layouts, run the same rules on each, and prove that every clearing account balance on the conversion date is explained by items that cleared afterward. When the old core is switched off, its source is retired and the rules stay.

Who buys reconciliation software on an FIS core

  • Controllers at IBS banks whose commercial ACH and wire volume outgrew a workbook per settlement account.
  • Deposit operations managers at Horizon banks who balance ACH, cards and official checks before starting their real job.
  • Heads of payment operations who need held batches, late wires and unposted returns owned and aged, not found at month end.
  • Banks in a core conversion that must prove every clearing account on both systems.
  • Institutions that priced Data Integrity Manager for daily domestic settlement and found the scope too large.

Getting live without touching the core

There is no core interface to license and nothing for FIS to schedule. Your FIS contract does not change.

Step 01

Choose two accounts

Usually ACH origination and Fedwire, or ACH and card settlement, because they break every day.

Step 02

Save the evidence as files

Core GL detail and settlement reports, the Fed statement of account, processor and network reports, Nacha files and correspondent statements. CSV, fixed width and BAI2 all work.

Step 03

Approve the rules

FedACH windows, IMAD matching for wires, network fee netting, many to one grouping. One person proposes a rule and a second approves it.

Step 04

Run one month in parallel

Include a month end, compare against the current workbook, then retire it. Fed, correspondent and suspense accounts follow.

What it costs

Pricing is published and set per institution, not per user. Operations is $1,200 a month for 250,000 matched items, three source connections and up to 10 users, enough for ACH and card settlement at most community banks on Horizon. Platform is $3,900 a month for 2,000,000 items, unlimited sources, up to 50 users, SSO and maker-checker approvals, which is where most IBS banks with commercial volume land. Institution is $9,500 a month with unlimited items and users for multi-charter holding companies. Annual billing halves each monthly rate. Every limit is on the pricing page.

The resolver at the top of this page runs the matcher on sample USD card settlement data, so you can see grouping, fee netting and break classification before you talk to anyone. The rule types are described on transaction matching software.

BankAutomation is an independent product and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or certified by FIS. FIS, IBS, Horizon, Modern Banking Platform, Data Integrity Manager and IntelliMatch are trademarks of their owners and are named only to describe compatibility.

Questions about reconciliation software for banks on FIS cores

Does FIS have reconciliation software?

Yes. FIS sells Data Integrity Manager, formerly IntelliMatch, for enterprise, nostro, ATM and confirmation matching with exception management, and a managed Optimized Reconciliation Service for capital markets. Both are aimed at large institutions. Banks on FIS cores that need daily ACH, Fedwire, card and Fed matching at community or regional bank scale often use spreadsheets or a separate platform instead.

What reconciliation software works with FIS IBS?

Any platform that reads files works with IBS, because reconciliation needs the core's GL detail and settlement reports, not a live connection. Banks on IBS use spreadsheets, FIS Data Integrity Manager, Trintech ReconNET or Frontier, ReconArt and BankAutomation. BankAutomation reads saved report files and publishes its price, from $1,200 a month.

How do banks on FIS Horizon reconcile ACH and card settlement?

They tie the ACH and card postings on the core and the clearing GL balances to outside evidence each day: FedACH settlement entries on the Fed statement of account, and processor and network settlement reports for cards. Most breaks are timing or netted fees. Software groups postings by settlement window and nets fees by rule, so only real differences stay open.

Does BankAutomation integrate with FIS Code Connect?

It works from files, not from Code Connect APIs. You save the core GL detail and settlement reports your team already uses, with the Fed, network and correspondent files, and BankAutomation matches them. Nothing is installed on the core and nothing posts back, so there is no integration project and no change to your FIS contract.

Is FIS Data Integrity Manager the same as IntelliMatch?

Yes. Data Integrity Manager is the current name for the platform FIS sold as IntelliMatch, which originally came from SunGard. It is SWIFT accredited and is now offered as SaaS on Microsoft Azure, as in the Commonwealth Bank of Australia deal announced in May 2026.

How much does reconciliation software cost for a bank on an FIS core?

FIS Data Integrity Manager and Trintech ReconNET are quoted per customer, and Capterra lists ReconArt from $300 per user a month. BankAutomation publishes its prices: $1,200 a month for 250,000 matched items and three sources, $3,900 for 2,000,000 items with unlimited sources and maker-checker approvals, and $9,500 for unlimited volume. Annual billing halves each monthly rate.

More banking automation pages

Every process line we cover, in one place.

Account reconciliation software Where the differences start, account by account. Bank reconciliation software Statement against ledger, MT940 and camt.053 native. Automated reconciliation software Match rates, tolerances, and what auto-match must never mean. Payment reconciliation software Instructed, settled and posted, reconciled three ways. Financial reconciliation software The same engine, framed for the finance team. ATM reconciliation software Cash, switch and network settlement, balanced daily. Credit union reconciliation software Corporate, share draft, card, ATM and shared branching. ACH reconciliation software Origination, receipt, returns and FedACH settlement. Federal Reserve account reconciliation Master account, FIRD, Fedwire and FedNow against the GL. Correspondent bank reconciliation Due from, due to and respondent settlement against the GL. Suspense account reconciliation Suspense and clearing accounts worked item by item, with an owner and an age. Frontier Reconciliation alternative What replaces each Frontier module when the upgrade quote arrives. ReconNET alternative What replaces each ReconNET workload at a bank or credit union, with pricing. Trintech Adra alternative What replaces Adra Matcher and Balancer at a bank or credit union, with pricing. Trintech Cadency alternative What replaces Cadency matching and reconciliation at a bank or credit union, with pricing. Accurate Reconciliation alternative What replaces Trintech Accurate matching and certification at a US bank, with pricing. SolveXia alternative What replaces SolveXia reconciliation at a US bank or credit union after the GTreasury deal, with pricing. OneStream reconciliation alternative When a US bank on OneStream should keep its Account Reconciliations solution, and when daily settlement matching belongs elsewhere. Modern Treasury alternatives When a US bank or fintech program needs reconciliation without adopting a new payment provider. Debit card reconciliation software Network settlement, interchange and disputes matched to the core every morning. Cash reconciliation software Vault, ATM, Fed cash and due from accounts tied to the GL every day. Loan reconciliation software Loan subledger, payment clearing, escrow and investor remittances tied to the GL. Transaction matching software Every settlement line paired with its postings, every break owned. Check reconciliation software Cash letters, inclearings, returns and official checks tied to the Fed and the GL. Fiserv reconciliation software Daily ACH, switch, card, Fed and GL reconciliation for banks and credit unions on Fiserv cores. Jack Henry reconciliation software Daily ACH, card, instant payment, Fed and GL reconciliation for banks and credit unions on Jack Henry cores. camt.053 reconciliation software camt.053, MT940 and BAI2 statements matched to the GL daily, with every break owned. Instant payments reconciliation software FedNow and RTP settlement matched to the core by cycle, seven days a week, with unposted payments owned and aged. Wire transfer reconciliation software Fedwire, CHIPS and SWIFT wires matched to the core, the Fed account and the correspondent statement, with unmatched wires owned and aged. Zelle reconciliation software Zelle activity matched to core postings and ACH or RTP settlement, with weekend balances explained and unposted payments owned. Credit card settlement reconciliation software Visa and Mastercard settlement, interchange income, rewards and disputes matched to the card ledger every morning. AML compliance software Program workflow, evidence and cadence. Not a detection model. KYC automation software Onboarding and periodic refresh, queued and evidenced. AML software for banks What to ask, and what to refuse to buy. Compliance workflow automation Maker-checker, SLAs and evidence as a system property. BSA AML monitoring software Alert triage as a worklist, not a second inbox. RPA for banks Why screen-scraping bots break, and what replaces them. General ledger reconciliation software Sub-ledger to GL, and the suspense account nobody owns. Balance sheet reconciliation software Certification, sign-off and the quarter-end pack. ISO 20022 payment automation Structured data, repair rates and CBPR+ deadlines. Nostro reconciliation automation The most bank-specific reconciliation there is. Payment exception management Returns, rejects and unmatched payments owned, aged and closed.

Get started

Put your first reconciliation on rails

Create an account, and we will email you how onboarding works and what a first source connection looks like. The Reconciliation Break Resolver is open to try right now, on sample data, without an account.

Run the demo

Creating an account with the button above needs no card; paid plans are paid on our payment processor's secure page. Sample data only in the demo. BankAutomation is operations software, not a regulated service.